Decision-Making in L&D: Structure Over Gut Feel

Here's something that doesn't get said enough in L&D: every decision is a tradeoff.

Build or buy? Now or next quarter? Self-paced or instructor-led? L&D teams make dozens of these calls every week, but few have a consistent way to decide.

Enter the Learning Operations Decision-Making Model™.

This model isn't about best practices. It's about operational clarity.

It gives your team a way to evaluate requests, shape solutions, and defend priorities without relying on gut instinct or executive pressure.

The model asks five questions:

1. What does the business need?

2. Does this align with our strategy?

3. Can we actually execute this well?

4. Will this deliver measurable value?

5. Have we cleared governance checks?

   
   
   
   

That's it. Five gates. Pass them, and it moves forward. Miss one, and the team either reframes or declines.

Let's break them down:

1. What does the business need? Every request should map to a business-critical performance gap or an operational goal. If you can't name the problem this solves, it doesn't belong in your queue.

2. Does this align with our strategy? Strategic alignment doesn't mean "someone important asked for it." It means the initiative supports key business metrics or capability priorities.

3. Can we actually execute this well? Capacity matters. Skillsets matter. Tech limitations matter. If you can't do it right, don't promise that you can deliver as requested.

4. Will this deliver measurable value? Can you connect this to something the business cares about? Time-to-proficiency, reduced errors, improved customer experience, lower turnover? If not, why are you doing it?

5. Have we cleared governance checks? Do you have the right stakeholders, approvals, data safeguards, and budget scope in place? If not, you don't have a green light yet.

This framework won't eliminate hard calls, but it will make them consistent.

Let's look at how we can apply the Learning Operations Decision-Making Model™ using the example of a request for a leadership shadowing program request.

Decision Gate	Guiding Question	Application to Scenario
1. Business Need	What problem are we solving?	Senior leaders want better succession planning for frontline leaders.
2. Strategic Alignment	Does this support company goals or talent strategy?	Yes. It aligns with internal mobility and leadership bench strength KPIs.
3. Feasibility	Do we have the capacity and infrastructure to deliver?	Partial. Requires cross-functional coordination and manager bandwidth.
4. Measurable Value	Will this improve performance or readiness?	Yes. If done right, it could reduce external hiring and turnover costs.
5. Governance Check	Are key stakeholders aligned and risks addressed?	Not yet. Requires HRBP and legal review for manager participation.

Verdict: Pause and reframe. The initiative aligns and has potential ROI but requires tighter execution planning and stakeholder sign-off before moving forward.

That's how L&D earns trust, not just by saying yes but by saying yes to the right things.

---

If you are enjoying this series, sign up for my monthly newsletter to continue to get practical tools, fresh thinking, and behind-the-scenes insight on how to run L&D like the business function it is. I also share templates, frameworks, and early access to new resources.

If you read this and are curious how it could apply inside your org, let’s talk. My 90-day framework, The Ignition Method, helps L&D leaders get focused and deliver measurable impact without burning out their team.

🗓️ Book a quick intro call so we can explore what’s possible.